<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Tablet&#8217;s a journey from nothing to nothing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tablethacker.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=384&#038;lang=en-us" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us</link>
	<description>FUD and Confusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us&#038;cpage=1#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a NIT, but always coveted one for the Linux in the pocket and have followed news since n770. A jailbroken iPod touch is no substitute :-)

I totally agree with the author/post as by analogy, ipod Touch + iPhone = successful App store. Different markets can really use different devices.

I too hope Nokia is not shortsighted to forsake their developer base and remain lost to the carriers with telephony only. Archos, Creative and probably even Palm will have a Wifi-only, PMP type iPod &#039;touch&#039; to expand base and spread their brand or OS; I look forward to Nokia doing the same. 

Pretty please?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a NIT, but always coveted one for the Linux in the pocket and have followed news since n770. A jailbroken iPod touch is no substitute <img src='http://tablethacker.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I totally agree with the author/post as by analogy, ipod Touch + iPhone = successful App store. Different markets can really use different devices.</p>
<p>I too hope Nokia is not shortsighted to forsake their developer base and remain lost to the carriers with telephony only. Archos, Creative and probably even Palm will have a Wifi-only, PMP type iPod &#8216;touch&#8217; to expand base and spread their brand or OS; I look forward to Nokia doing the same. </p>
<p>Pretty please?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turn.self.off</title>
		<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us&#038;cpage=1#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>turn.self.off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384#comment-180</guid>
		<description>quick guess is that the call interface have gotten to much of a focus, being the only app supporting rotation, and even autolaunching if the device is rotated while showing the desktop.

basically, nokia have gone from &quot;the UMTS radio is only for data&quot; to making voice calls a very prominent feature of the device.

i would have loved to see it used on the table as a video phone, and then later discover that it was using UMTS video, not skype or some other voip. Or maybe even voip or HSPA connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quick guess is that the call interface have gotten to much of a focus, being the only app supporting rotation, and even autolaunching if the device is rotated while showing the desktop.</p>
<p>basically, nokia have gone from &#8220;the UMTS radio is only for data&#8221; to making voice calls a very prominent feature of the device.</p>
<p>i would have loved to see it used on the table as a video phone, and then later discover that it was using UMTS video, not skype or some other voip. Or maybe even voip or HSPA connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinbait</title>
		<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us&#038;cpage=1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinbait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384#comment-179</guid>
		<description>yeah swiss army knives are great.  have you ever tried to actually use the cork screw, how about the tree saw.  A true mobile computing experience will never happen on a 3.5 inch screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah swiss army knives are great.  have you ever tried to actually use the cork screw, how about the tree saw.  A true mobile computing experience will never happen on a 3.5 inch screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us&#038;cpage=1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384#comment-178</guid>
		<description>mobilecomputer speaks the reasoned conclusion. Having everything in one device is true convergence. At present you&#039;re left trying to tether your internet tablet which is not practical or efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mobilecomputer speaks the reasoned conclusion. Having everything in one device is true convergence. At present you&#8217;re left trying to tether your internet tablet which is not practical or efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobilecomputer</title>
		<link>http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384&amp;lang=en-us&#038;cpage=1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>mobilecomputer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tablethacker.com/wp/?p=384#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Why does a phone have to be such a banned feature?

Even if you would not use N900 as a phone as such, I think having 24/7 internet connection, regardless of the geographical location, a _pre-requisite_ of proper mobile internet experience.

Carrying a second device, a phone, next to a non-phone internet tablet, for the sake of that internet connectivity is, to me, very clunky. And very far from ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does a phone have to be such a banned feature?</p>
<p>Even if you would not use N900 as a phone as such, I think having 24/7 internet connection, regardless of the geographical location, a _pre-requisite_ of proper mobile internet experience.</p>
<p>Carrying a second device, a phone, next to a non-phone internet tablet, for the sake of that internet connectivity is, to me, very clunky. And very far from ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
