Related Articles

9 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
User Gravatar
havoc said in September 9th, 2009 at 11:17

Wow…. my response was just the opposite. “$650! It’s worth that to me (given the very impressive specs) even if the phone feature didn’t work for me.”

For me: Take out the phone, and the N900 is the pocketable device I’ve been waiting for for 10 years. Palm V – no. Sony Clie – no. Sharp Zaurus – fail. Nokia n810 – cose enough… “for now.”

N900! Woohoo! …. “all that and a phone for free? Cool!”

I’m always shocked at how different our (people) reactions are from one another.

User Gravatar
falok said in September 9th, 2009 at 13:48

Well it all depends on your monthly income on how you see $650. If you earn, lets say $1300 a month that would be half of your earnings. On the other hand if you would earn $2600 it’s just a quarter.

And with $1300 you probably won’t have that much to spend freely anyway.

The price tag IS high – but you also get something for your money.

User Gravatar
nobody said in September 9th, 2009 at 14:01

Give it another 3-6 months after release. It will get cheaper. Look at the prices for Nokia’s flagship phones to see what I mean.

User Gravatar
penguinbait said in September 9th, 2009 at 14:03

Hmmm, life is not always as simple as that. I can make much more than 2600$ a month and still think $650 is a lot on money for a cell phone. I am married with with 4 kids from 10-16 years of age, and 650$ would buy almost a month of groceries. Then there is a mortgage payment, and two car payments and insurance on home and auto, and TAXES, gasoline, and every other nickle and dime being sucked out of my pocket monthly. I am just saying the average American does not have 650$ to spend on a cell phone. The ones that do are less likely to have T-mobile as a carrier, and the majority of T-mobile customers like me, who live in a large city an hour from Detroit Michigan and there is no t-mobile 3g service. It all just seems like a bad plan?

User Gravatar
qole said in September 9th, 2009 at 14:46

Just wait until you get a chance to try this thing, penguinbait. It is really something special. I hope the price will come down, too, but it is really worth a premium over the other, older tablets.

User Gravatar
penguinbait said in September 9th, 2009 at 14:52

Yes Qole, Quim’s blog also seemed to make me think having it in hand may give you a different perspective. It’s definitely easier to keep the faith with proof of the afterlife in your hand… can I get an AMEN!!!

User Gravatar
Charlie Mote said in September 9th, 2009 at 18:01

The N900 is competition for the defunct OQO – it fills the space that OQO never quite did (Win XP on a tiny screen?) at a quarter of the OQO price.

I agree it won’t displace the iPhone – too much market share momentum, but it does set Nokia up to leap-frog on the next iteration of chip technology. Hopefully this will finally settle the internal struggle at Nokia over Symbian v. Linux (Maemo).

Anyone willing to use a phone and a N810, as in your case, isn’t going to shell out more to just consolidate to one device – you are on the bleeding edge and obviously a Nokia tablet addict.

But for anyone who wants a 3G PC that fits in their pocket (and truly replaces other mobile devices, including IR remotes, see, full bluetooth HID ( bluetooth pocket keyboards out-of-the-box) this is the _only_ device going. If the USB port supports Clearwire WiMax, then, all the better for the non-traveler (no TMobile contracts.)

Let’s see if someone gets a full portrait mode running (Nokia should have had this on their list – let the user decide what mode to put it in) and what other goodies the Maemo community is cooking up.

The N900 is clearly a “power-user” device, not a fashion statement as the iPhone has become. It’s also got Palm beat on resurrecting the original Palm “pocket PC” experience.

I’m glad I got the N770 to understand the power of the “pocket desktop” (and now to have another wifi VNC/web browser around the house) and also glad I waited for the N900 to deliver on the iPhone’s promises.

Good luck with your deliberating!


User Gravatar
Mathias Hasselmann said in September 9th, 2009 at 18:22

You might want to think about getting a subsidised version of the device: One great feature of the device is the built-in UMTS modem. This allows you to be online everytime – if you have a mobile data flatrate. So my suggestion is: Get a mobile contract with a data flatrate and let your mobile operator pay the device.

It was hinted several times that such subsidised versions would be sold for one symbolic Euro.

User Gravatar
Jon Pritchard said in September 10th, 2009 at 15:23

SIM Free always costs the most, you need to get it as an upgrade or put money towards the cost of the handset on a new contract deal.

Unfortunately my contract doesn’t run out for another 9 months and then it looks like there might be an N901 out :(

Leave A Reply

 Username (Required)

 Email Address (Remains Private)

 Website (Optional)